3. The detention basin has been designed with a wet bottom, so there will be approximately 6
Jeff explained that on this site, the surface portion of the soil has indications that there are wetland soils. However, when you dig deeper into the soils, there is clear evidence through the color of the soils that wetlands are not present.
Jeff felt the following issues need to be revised:
1. Anti tracking pads need to be added to the revised plan.
2. Additional yard drains to be placed along the line to intercept water that comes down.
3. Yearly treatment of mosquito larvacide be part of the maintenance plan for the detention basin, to be done as recommended by DEP.
Answering questions from the Commission, Jeff stated that the mosquito larvacide is very effective and not toxic to any other living thing but mosquito larva.
Mr. DeMallie told members that there are two cul-de-sacs because the development had to meet Town standards. The first cul-de-sac is a public street. A 50' right of way was granted, but there was not sufficient frontage for the development. They immediately created a cul-de-sac which has to be a town road within the right of way. This design gives this project enough frontage.
Mr. Semprebon concluded that other alternatives for the lawn drains going directly into the storm sewers can be investigated because Commission members do have concern about this.
Jeff told IWA/CC members that there is no attempt within the interior portion of the site to leave trees, although there has been on the perimeter. The wildlife that is currently there will be displaced by this development. Song birds will still use this area after landscaping is complete. Mr. DeMallie stated that there was a lot of thought put into the design in order to preserve trees around the perimeter, and that the buffer was designed at 35' in order to preserve the area.
Jeff informed the applicant and Commission members that the Town Planner has had some indications that if there are no wetlands on this site, P & Z Commission members will be looking for a larger width between the buildings.
Commissioner Kelly stated that she feels it would be best to leave blocks of open space in places rather than spread buildings over the whole property. The Commission discussed this situation over and decided it should be brought to the P & Z Commissions attention
Public
Mr. Bill Donlin, 205 Hilton Drive, asked for an explanation regarding the buffer.
Mr. Galen Semprebon explained that under the zoning regulations, there is a 25' buffer and a 10' side yard. For the buildings this plan has a 35' buffer area and near the detention basin the plan has a 25' buffer area.
Mr. Bill Donlin's explained that his concern is that the stormwater system be engineered properly in order to collect water. There is already a water problem in this area. Mr. Donlin expressed his concerns about the west nile virus. Chairperson Warren informed Mr. Donlin that if this Commission approves this application, compliance is necessary if any conditions are placed on this application.
Mr. Dave McLaughlin, 311 Hilton Drive. There are underground springs in this area. Concerned that this development will create a larger water problem then presently existing.
Mr. Roger Merrill, 109 Hilton Drive is concerned with water problems.
Mr. Galen Semprebon stated that this project is connecting into the existing system. Runoff will not come out as quickly because with this system the water will be over-detained.
Mr. Jim Smeallie 164 Hilton Drive. The storm drain in this area has been repaired by the Town several times. Mr. Smeallie does not want to have a wet basement.
Mr. Semprebon explained to the public that working with town staff he would explore other options that may be available to handle the water in this area. Mr. Semprebon explained the water runoff procedure to the public saying that there will not be any more water coming off the site then what presently does. Peak flows will be significantly less after this development is complete, due to the construction of the detention basin.
Mr. Dave McLaughlin, 311 Hilton Drive explained that when he constructed an addition he had to remove the foundation drain because it would get clogged and feels with this the development the same problem will occur.
Mr. Roger Merrill, 109 Hilton Drive explained that he felt this development will cause problems because there are springs on this site.
Mr. Bernie Hebert, 123 Hilton Drive came before the Commission. Mr. Hebert asked what will happen when their cellars flood? He also felt that this site should be looked at again for wetlands.
Mr. Galen Semprebon explained that there is nothing from this development that will cause an increase in water through these properties.
Chairperson Warren informed the public that there will be a Planning & Zoning Commission meeting held on September 24, 2002 for anyone who is interested in attending in order to bring up planning & zoning issues.
The public hearing was continued to the October 2, 2002 meeting.
ITEM: Applications Received
Appl. #02-58P Parksite Pllunket-Webster
Jeff explained that the site is planned to have an industrial building constructed. There are no significant wetland disturbances on this site. Impervious coverage is less than 65%. It was the unanimous consensus of the Commission that a public hearing would not be necessary on this application.
ITEM: Adjournment
Motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 p.m.
Was made by Commissioner Phillips
Seconded by Commissioner Forzley
The motion: carried
The vote was as follows: unanimous
Respectfully submitted
___________________________ ________________________
Deborah W. Reid, Recording Secretary Date Approved
